Agenda and minutes

Public Speaking: To register your intention to speak at a Council, Cabinet or Committee meeting, please contact Democratic Services on committee@uttlesford.gov.uk or 01799 510410, 510548, 510369 or 510460. Panel, Forum and Working Group meetings do not generally permit public speaking. Please refer to a specific meeting's pdf agenda pack for further information and registration deadlines.

Live Broadcast: For Council, Cabinet and Committee meetings the video player will be available on this page under the Media banner a few minutes before the meeting is due to begin. Please note that Panel, Board, Forum and Working Group meetings are not generally broadcast on the website. We believe that live streaming video of our formal decision making meetings, and publishing the recordings to be watched back later, is good for democracy – and you can find these videos on our website. This video technology sits alongside the longstanding practice of providing seats in the public gallery for members of the public and journalists to turn up and watch our in-person meetings live. Please understand that whilst we will continue to make every reasonable effort to ensure that our key public meetings at which important decisions are live streamed and recorded, any failure in that technology does not in any way invalidate the legitimacy of that meeting or of the decisions taken at it. Even in the event of such occasional technical failures, the public gallery will still have been open, as required by law, and the minutes of the meetings will still be made available in due course.

Zoom and YouTube have their own privacy and data security policies, which can be accessed at www.zoom.us and www.youtube.com.

Venue: Committee Room - Council Offices, London Road, Saffron Walden, Essex CB11 4ER. View directions

Contact: Democratic Services  Email: committee@uttlesford.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

1.

Apologies for Absence and Declarations of Interest

To receive any apologies for absence and declarations of interest.

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Asker, G Barker and Oliver.

2.

Minutes of the Previous Meeting pdf icon PDF 56 KB

To consider the minutes of the previous meeting.

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 1 May 2018 were signed and approved as a correct record subject to the following amendment to the resolution of minute S7:

 

RESOLVED to recommend to Cabinet the following draft proposals:

 

i.          The 2019/20 LCTS scheme is set on the same basis as the 2018/19 scheme and therefore the contribution rate is frozen for the fifth consecutive year.  

 

ii.          The Council continues to protect Vulnerable and Disabled Residents and Carers on a low income.

 

iii.        The empty homes premium is increased from 50% to 100% after     2 years of  non-occupancy.

 

3.

Cabinet Forward Plan pdf icon PDF 75 KB

To receive the updated Cabinet Forward Plan.

Minutes:

The Committee noted the updated Forward Plan. 

4.

Scrutiny Work Programme 2018-19 pdf icon PDF 44 KB

To receive the Scrutiny Work Programme for 2018-19.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee considered the Scrutiny Work Programme for 2018-19 and the suggested topics list.

 

Members discussed the suggested topic ‘Review of the Cabinet System’ which had been on the potential scrutiny programme for two years but had yet to be added to the formal programme. Concerns were raised that this project would be resource intensive and could not be carried out in 2018. Furthermore, 2019 was an election year and Members discussed whether it would be appropriate for this Committee to put forward an item that would be addressed by a new Council. 

 

A motion was proposed and seconded to formally add this item to the work programme for 2019.

 

The motion was defeated. 

 

5.

Street Services update pdf icon PDF 62 KB

To receive an update from Street Services including the waste education action plan.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Cabinet Member for Environmental Services presented the report to the Committee.

 

Members noted that the recycling rate had fallen and residual waste had increased in the past two years. In part, this was attributed to housing growth in the district. An action plan for waste education and awareness was being implemented to discourage littering, increase participation in the Council’s recycling services and to help reduce contamination levels. Directing education at school age children was seen as an effective strategy in changing attitudes towards waste disposal and culture, although there was a consensus that a wide-ranging campaign would also be helpful.

 

To increase recycling rates and minimise residual waste, Members suggested engaging with the public by using the following methods:

 

·         Engaging with the retail sector to encourage more sustainable commercial waste practices and the reduction of littering e.g. providing fewer disposable cups or using recyclable plastic packaging. Businesses who had signed up to the Saffron Walden BID were cited as potential partners. 

·         Clarifying the Household Waste list to minimise the potential of fly tipping. 

·         To canvass the opinion of the Youth Council with regards to educational schemes directed at children and schools.

·         To include information relating to recycling on the Housing trailer that visited developments across the district. 

·         To include information relating to recycling in the Tenants’ Newsletter.

·         To increase the presence of littering and recycling campaigns such as the ‘Campaign for a Cleaner Essex’.

 

6.

Affordable Housing Scrutiny report pdf icon PDF 101 KB

To consider the report on Affordable Housing in the Proposed Garden Communities.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chairman moved item 10 forward in proceedings for the benefit of those present.

 

The Cabinet Member for Housing introduced the report to the Committee. She said whilst there was much work to be done on the Council’s affordable housing policy, the findings of the Affordable Housing Discussion Group were a good starting point and should be taken into account in the forthcoming review of the Council’s Housing Strategy.

 

Members discussed the content of the report.

 

In response to a Member question, the Project Manager - Planning Policy said the proposed Affordable Housing Policy would be referenced in the Local Plan. The Local Plan aspired to include 40% affordable housing in the proposed garden communities but what had yet to be decided upon was the eligibility criteria for these affordable properties. He said this was the opportunity for Members to comment on the policy and he asked Members to contact him if they had any questions.

 

The Housing Strategy and Operations Manager said the Discussion group had agreed to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation measure of housing affordability. This defined affordable housing costs as being less than 35% of household income. She said the real question was not how to define ‘affordable’ but how to deliver homes at such a cost, and it would be for Members to decide upon what affordable housing model would be used.

 

The Chairman tabled an alternative recommendation to that which was in the report. The Committee accepted this recommendation.

 

RESOLVED that the Scrutiny Committee notes the findings and work to date of the Scrutiny Committee Affordable Housing Discussion Group and considers that this is work still in progress. The committee recommends that the work be continued and, in due course, is considered when refreshing the Uttlesford Housing Strategy and in the delivery stages of Garden Communities.

 

The committee notes in particular the following interim ideas from the report:


(i). Changes to the eligibility criteria of the allocations policy and the creation of a new ‘Intermediate’ Housing Register. All existing employees within Uttlesford District on permanent contracts would be eligible for the Council’s ‘Intermediate’ Housing Register and associated affordable housing, providing the household can evidence that they cannot afford (even with tax credits) private rented housing because it costs more than 35% (gross) of their total weekly household income, but could afford the weekly rental at truly affordable levels at Local Housing Authority rates or at rates available from a Community Land Trust or similar scheme, ideally avoiding the need for Housing Benefit. 

 

(ii). Adopt the term truly affordable homes to distinguish future home delivery that meets local income criteria and achieves home availability that equates to costs that are equivalent to traditional social provision or cheaper.

 

(iii). In the case of the two Garden Communities that adjoin the district boundary, then consideration could be given to enable permanent employees working within the immediate vicinity (still to be defined) access to the truly affordable housing provision.

(iv). The council could consider allowing under-occupation for  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6.

7.

Centre for Public Scrutiny - Action Plan pdf icon PDF 73 KB

To consider the action plan proposed by the Centre for Public Scrutiny.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Assistant Director – Corporate Services presented the report to the Committee. As there were implications for both Scrutiny and Cabinet Members, a meeting would take place to discuss implementation of the Action Plan in the near future.

 

Members discussed the content of the Action Plan.    

 

In response to a question from Councillor Light, the Assistant Director – Corporate Services said the Corporate Management Team monitored the Scrutiny work programme to provide oversight. He said this had been approved by the Scrutiny Committee at a previous meeting.

 

The Chairman said he and Councillor G Barker would be meeting with relevant Officers to ensure the recommendations of the CfPS were realised.

 

RESOLVED that the Committee endorses the approach and actions proposed in the action plan to address the points raised by the CfPS.

 

8.

Investment Strategy pdf icon PDF 51 KB

To recieve the Investment Strategy report.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Cabinet Member for Finance and Administration introduced the report on the Council’s Investment Strategy.  

 

In response to a question from Councillor LeCount, the Director of Corporate and Financial Services said the largest piece of land the Council owned was large enough to build fourteen houses. With regards to purchasing land for the building of market houses, he said they were not ruling out the option but there were high risks involved.

 

The Chairman asked whether the Council had a risk register relating to its investments.

 

The Assistant Director – Corporate Services said there was a risk register for Chesterford Research Park and a similar approach would be taken for other acquisitions.  

 

In response to a question regarding the risks to the Council’s investment following Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union, the Cabinet Member for Finance and Administration said reserves were in place and a covenant of tenancy had been agreed to safeguard the Council’s position. He added that the tenants were not overly concerned as they were research, rather than manufacturing, companies and would not be adversely impacted by a withdrawal from the customs union. In general, he said, good progress had been made and the park was attracting new tenants.

 

The Chairman said he had asked for feedback from the non-executive directors of Aspire on the progress and risks of the Council’s investment at Chesterford Research Park. This feedback would be brought to Members at a future committee meeting.

 

 In response to a Member question, the Cabinet member for Finance and Administration said there were no imminent investment opportunities but the Council were on the look-out. He said as soon as something was found that was compliant with the Council’s Investment Strategy, it would be brought before Members for approval.  

 

 

 

The meeting ended at 9.35pm.