Agenda and minutes
Public Speaking: To register your intention to speak at a Council, Cabinet or Committee meeting, please contact Democratic Services on committee@uttlesford.gov.uk or 01799 510410, 510548, 510369 or 510460. Panel, Forum and Working Group meetings do not generally permit public speaking. Please refer to a specific meeting's pdf agenda pack for further information and registration deadlines.
Live Broadcast: For Council, Cabinet and Committee meetings the video player will be available on this page under the Media banner a few minutes before the meeting is due to begin. Please note that Panel, Board, Forum and Working Group meetings are not generally broadcast on the website. We believe that live streaming video of our formal decision making meetings, and publishing the recordings to be watched back later, is good for democracy – and you can find these videos on our website. This video technology sits alongside the longstanding practice of providing seats in the public gallery for members of the public and journalists to turn up and watch our in-person meetings live. Please understand that whilst we will continue to make every reasonable effort to ensure that our key public meetings at which important decisions are live streamed and recorded, any failure in that technology does not in any way invalidate the legitimacy of that meeting or of the decisions taken at it. Even in the event of such occasional technical failures, the public gallery will still have been open, as required by law, and the minutes of the meetings will still be made available in due course.
Zoom and YouTube have their own privacy and data security policies, which can be accessed at www.zoom.us and www.youtube.com.
PDF 142 KBVenue: Committee Room - Council Offices, London Road, Saffron Walden, Essex CB11 4ER. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services 01799 510434 Email: committee@uttlesford.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Minutes: Barry Drinkwater gave a public statement to the committee. A copy of this statement is appended to these minutes.
|
|
|
Apologies for Absence and Declarations of Interest To receive any apologies for absence and declarations of interest. Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillor Loughlin who could not attend the training after the meeting.
|
|
|
Minutes of Previous Meetings To consider the minutes of previous meetings. Additional documents:
Minutes: The minutes of the meetings held on 2 February, 12 June, 22 June, 31 July and 29 August were received and signed by the Chairman as a correct record.
|
|
|
Revised Statement of Policy To consider the revised Statement of Policy. Additional documents: Minutes: The Licensing Team Leader said the Council was required to review its Statement of Licensing Policy every five years. It was last reviewed in 2012, so it was time to review it again. The revision contained additional supportive information and relevant updates brought in by recent legislation.
Councillors Barker and Chambers asked the Licensing Team Leader to write a letter on their behalf thanking the sole respondent to the review.
Councillor Chambers thanked the Licensing Team Leader and the Solicitor for their work on the revised statement.
RESOLVED to approve the proposed amendments to the Policy and recommend to full council that the amended Policy be adopted.
|
|
|
Details of Scoping for the Proposed Review of Licensing Policy To consider the details of scoping for the proposed review of licensing policy. Minutes: The Environmental Health Officer (Commercial) read out the report.
In relation to paragraph 18, the Chairman said he didn’t want members to take up more time than necessary. He would look to arrange a date that as many members as possible could make.
In response to a question from Councillor Sell asking if the driver of the review was the aim to prevent licenses being issued to companies based outside of Uttlesford, the Chairman said the review was driven by a need to have a policy which was up to date, effective and more similar to other districts nationally. The main aim was to make sure drivers were fit and proper people in order to ensure public safety.
In response to questions about charges for licensing in the district, the Licensing Team Leader said she would not be surprised if their charges were some of the lowest in the country. The Solicitor said it would not be appropriate to discriminate between those applying for licenses who live in the district and those who live outside the district. Companies based outside the district would not be issued with licenses.
In response to questions from Councillor Barker, the Environmental Health Officer (Commercial) said Mr Rawlings had been identified by peer review, and that between 15-20 days’ worth of his salary would be back paid to him. The wording ‘full autonomy’ on paragraph 16 would be changed to reflect that Mr Rawlings would not have complete autonomy during his review.
In response to a question from Councillor Barker, the Environmental Health Officer (Commercial) said it would not be an officer review, but one of policy. No judgement would be made on staff, and the review would only look at present actions. He would change the wording to reflect this.
In response to a question from Councillor Gerard regarding a comparison with other districts with operating airports, the Environmental Health Officer (Commercial) said the review would not look specifically at this because Stansted Airport was not problematic for licensing. The growth of Uber was probably the biggest challenge for the Licensing Team. He said Uttlesford was a cheap district to be registered in, and at the moment the Council did not require prospective drivers to take a knowledge test. The team was looking to raise standards of drivers, and there was the possibility to raise fees.
The Chairman said any fees raised from Licensing charges would be used in for other Licensing matters in the future. The Council’s fees were cheap because the department was efficient and because it was right not to charge more than was necessary.
Members asked that the review incorporate a comparison between what Uttlesford District Council did for the £50 it charged for licensing fees, and what other councils that were charging more did for their licensing fees. The Environmental Health Officer (Commercial) said this was covered by the mention of benchmarking in paragraph 20.
In response to a question from Councillor Sell, the Environmental Health Officer (Commercial) said ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
|
Right to Work Checks - Video Conferencing Trial Review Update To consider the video conferencing trial review update. Minutes: The Licensing Officer read out the report. She said the trial had generally gone well, and the team saw no reason to discontinue the video conferencing. They would also be willing to extend it to other large operators on request provided that the same procedure is followed.
In response to questions asking if there was a way of confirming the identity of an individual over a video conferencing link, the Licensing Officer said she had their original identification documents in front of her and photographs of each driver were sent up by the operator
The committee noted the report.
The meeting ended at 8.45pm.
|