Agenda item

Budget Report 2019/20

To consider the budget reports and associated appendices for 2019/20.

Minutes:

Councillor Howell, as Portfolio Holder for Finance and Administration, presented the budget reports for 2019-20. He said the format was different from previous years, with each budgetary scheme being applied as an appendix to the overall covering report, as each report could not be seen in isolation, but rather as part of a longer term narrative. He said he would highlight areas of the budget which he believed were of importance to the Committee.

 

Treasury Management Strategy

 

Councillor Howell highlighted the balance sheet summary and five year forecast, which showed the Council’s actual borrowings as of November 2018 as well as likely borrowings in the next five years. He said there was a change to the lending limit to local authorities, from £6 million to £3 million.

 

Capital Strategy  

 

Capital expenditure for 2019/20 was estimated to be £17 million. This was due to the renewal of the street services fleet, ICT development projects and the asset maintenance programme.

 

Councillor Howell drew the Committee’s attention to the Minimum Revenue Provision Statement 2019/20 which stipulated that where the council finances capital expenditure by debt, it must put aside resources to repay that debt in later years.

 

Capital Programme

 

Nearly £35 million had been allocated to the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) for the next five years (2018/19 to 2023/24). This was to fund the developments at Reynolds Court, Walden Place and Hatherley Court. These projects had received the approval of the Housing Board.

 

Housing Revenue Account

 

The Council was still committed to investing in housing stock, particularly sheltered housing schemes, and since the introduction of self-financing had built over 100 homes. As government policy regarding borrowing caps had recently changed, officers were looking into the new financing rules to ascertain whether there would be an opportunity to do more.

 

General Fund and Council Tax 2019/20

 

Members were informed of the proposal to increase council tax by 2.99% which would mean a Band D household would pay £151.61 for 2019/20, compared to £147.21 in 2018/19.

 

A surplus of £2.2 million had been identified for 2019/20.

 

Councillor Howell said the Council had worked hard to protect the budget and most departmental budgets remained unchanged.

 

In terms of the General Funds Reserve, significant sums had been ring fenced for the Waste Depot relocation project and for strategic initiatives.

 

Section 25 report – Robustness of Estimates and Adequacy of Reserves

 

Councillor Howell highlighted the Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) which showed an accumulative deficit over the next five years. To address this deficit, the Investment Strategy recommended the approval of £100 million of borrowing for investment to generate additional income. He said any use of this borrowing would be brought to Full Council for members’ consideration although now would be the time to ensure the Council had the necessary income to maintain the level of services it provided. Due to the substantial changes to government funding of local authorities, the Council was facing a deterioration in finances over the next five years, which, in part would be mitigated by the investment in CRP. He said this was a binary choice; either the Council cut services or generated additional income through strategic investments.

 

Investment Strategy

 

Councillor Howell said further investments would be required if services were to be maintained at their current level. It was anticipated that the Council would need to borrow £80 million to fund investments, and £20 million for loans to Aspire (CRP) in the next three years. The Council’s preferred investment route was to acquire commercial property in the district, however such opportunities were rare and therefore opportunities would be sought in neighbouring counties and UK wide, if necessary. He stressed that whilst there were many opportunities out there, it was critical that the Council only invested in the ‘right’ project. 

 

In conclusion, Councillor Howell said the Council would have to work hard to manage its finances in the foreseeable future although he believed the current budget provided the tools to navigate the Council through an anticipated difficult five years.

 

The Chairman thanked Councillor Howell for his presentation and asked members to raise any questions they had regarding the budget.

 

In response to a Member question, the Assistant Director – Resources said 0% budgeting had been applied to a number of service areas including Customer Services, Performance and Revenues. She said that next year the MTFS would dictate where the Council focused next.

 

In response to a Member question, the Director – Finance and Corporate Services said the budget had been stress tested and finances could go into the negatives depending on the variable applied.

 

The Chairman asked why the Council had not taken advantage of the removal of the borrowing cap and invested more in council housing.

 

Councillor Howell said the Council had demonstrated its ambition in building council houses but much work was still required to ensure any additional borrowing was commercially prudent.

 

The Chairman suggested that they further explore the role of scrutiny in the governance of council investments.

 

Councillor Howell said he agreed in principle but this would only work if all councillors were behind the project; if Members were partisan, investments would fail. He said it was damaging to the Council and its partners if Members continued to debate commercial projects in the public domain. A mechanism would need to be established whereby Members could engage in private debate without harming the commercial prospects of an investment.

 

Councillor Light said she would like to see an independent board of experts established to oversee the Council’s investments.

 

Councillor Howell said he disagreed as he believed responsibility should be shouldered by Members, who were democratically accountable to the electorate. 

In response to a request from the Chairman, Councillor Rolfe said the Council was lobbying central government to send the message that there was a limit to the degree of funding cuts that the Council could sustain.

 

In response to a Member question about the procurement of new refuse vehicles, the Director – Finance and Corporate Services said options were explored at the evaluation stage of the process but ‘green’ refuse vehicles were not available.

 

In response to a Member question regarding investment opportunities, Councillor Howell said partnerships with other local authorities would be considered if the right project could be found.

 

Councillor Oliver said every council in the UK would be looking for similar opportunities to make investments and urged the Council to be cautious if it was to invest in areas other than the immediate locality.

 

The Director – Finance and Corporate Services said an Investment Action Plan would be brought for the Committee’s consideration if the Investment Strategy was approved by Full Council on 21 February 2019.

 

The meeting ended at 9.00pm. 

 

Supporting documents: